Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological traits associated with drought resistance in Andean and Mesoamerican genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important grain legume for human consumption, and drought stress affects over 60 % of dry bean production worldwide. Field and rainout shelter studies were conducted at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Palmira, Colombia to (i) evaluate phenotypic differences in drought resistance in Andean and Mesoamerican gene pools, (ii) identify genotypes of both Andean and Mesoamerican with superior drought resistance, and (iii) identify phenotypic traits that may be useful for breeding to improve drought resistance in common bean. A total of 24 bean genotypes, twelve genotypes belonging to Mesoamerican gene pool and twelve to Andean gene pool were evaluated under field with two levels of water supply (irrigated and rainfed) and managed drought under rainout shelter conditions. Results showed that five Mesoamerican lines SEA 5, SEA 15, SER 22, SER 16, SER 8 and one Andean line SEQ 1003 have superior resistance to drought. The superior performance of these lines under drought stress was associated with better canopy biomass at mid-pod filling that could be related to deeper root system and effective use of water, combined with efficient remobilization of photosynthates from vegetative structures to pod development (pod partitioning index, PPI) and grain filling (pod harvest index, PHI). Pod harvest index could be a useful selection criteria for drought resistance, to improve the efficiency of breeding programs for selecting superior genotypes of common bean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta-Gallegos JA, White JW (1995) Phenological plasticity as an adaptation by common bean to rainfed environments. Crop Sci 35:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assefa T, Beebe S, Rao IM, Cuasquer J, Duque MC, Rivera M, Battisti A, Lucchin M (2013) Pod harvest index as a selection criterion to improve drought resistance in white pea bean. Field Crop Res 148:24–33. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balota M, Payne WA, Evett SR, Lazar MD (2007) Canopy temperature depression sampling to assess grain yield and genotypic differentiation in winter wheat. Crop Sci 47:1518. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe S, Skroch PW, Tohme J, Duque MC, Pedraza F, Nienhuis J (2000) Structure of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. Crop Sci 40:264–273. doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.401264x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe S, Rao IM, Cajiao C, Grajales M (2008) Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favorable environments. Crop Sci 48:582. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.07.0404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe S, Rao IM, Blair MW, Acosta-Gallegos JA (2013) Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Front Physiol 4:1–20. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair MW, Giraldo MC, Buendía HF, Tovar E, Duque MC, Beebe S (2006) Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 113:100–109. doi:10.1007/s00122-006-0276-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust J Agric Res 56:1159–1168. doi:10.1071/AR05069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crop Res 112:119–123. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55:2447–2460. doi:10.1093/jxb/erh277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuellar-Ortiz SM, De La Paz Arrieta-Montiel M, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Covarrubias AA (2008) Relationship between carbohydrate partitioning and drought resistance in common bean. Plant Cell Environ 31:1399–1409. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01853.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT (1984) Physiological aspects of varietal improvement. In: Gustafson J (ed) Gene manipulation in plant improvement. Springer US, pp 121–146

  • Gepts P, Debouck D (1991) Origin, domestication, and evolution of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In: Common beans: research for crop improvement, pp 7–53

  • Girdthai T, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Vorasoot Akkasaeng C, Wongkaew S, Holbrook CC, Patanothai A (2009) Relationship between root characteristics of peanut in hydroponics and pot studies. Crop Sci 50:159–167. doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.09.0529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE (2004) Comparative ecophysiology of cowpea, common bean and peanut. In: Nguyen HT, Blum A (eds) Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 271–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaedtke SM, Cajiao C, Grajales M, Polania J, Borrero G, Guerrero A, Rivera M, Rao IM, Beebe S, Leon J (2012) Photosynthate remobilization capacity from drought-adapted common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines can improve yield potential of interspecific populations within the secondary gene pool. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 4:49–61. doi:10.5897/JPBCS11.087

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlot S, Mustilli A-C, Genty B, North H, Lefebvre V, Sotta B, Vavasseur A, Giraudat J (2002) Use of infrared thermal imaging to isolate Arabidopsis mutants defective in stomatal regulation. Plant J 30:601–609. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01322.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mir RR, Zaman-Allah M, Sreenivasulu N, Trethowan RM, Varshney RK (2012) Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops. Theor Appl Genet 125:625–645. doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1904-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Perea CG, Terán H, Allen RG, Wright JL, Westermann DT, Singh SP (2006) Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Sci 46:2111. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Perea CG, Allen RG, Westermann DT, Wright JL, Singh SP (2007) Water use efficiency among dry bean landraces and cultivars in drought-stressed and non-stressed environments. Euphytica 155:393–402. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9340-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polania J, Rao IM, Beebe S, Garcia R (2009) Root development and distribution under drought stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a soil tube system. Agron Columbiana 27:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Polania J, Rao IM, Mejía S, Beebe S, Cajiao C (2012) Características morfo-fisiológicas de frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) relacionadas con la adaptación a sequía. Acta Agron 61:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao IM (2014) Advances in improving adaptation of common bean and Brachiaria forage grasses to abiotic stresses in the tropics. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop physiology, third edit. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, pp 847–889

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rao IM, Beebe S, Polania J, Ricaurte J, Cajiao C, Garcia R, Rivera M (2013) Can tepary bean be a model for improvement of drought resistance in common bean? Afr Crop Sci J 21:265–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds MP, Trethowan RM (2007) Physiological interventions in breeding for adaptation to abiotic stress. In: Spiertz JHJ, Struik PC, van Laar HH (eds) Scale and complexity in plant systems research, gene–plant–crop relations. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, pp 127–144

  • Rosales MA, Ocampo E, Rodríguez-Valentín R, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Covarrubias AA (2012) Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance. Plant Physiol Biochem 56:24–34. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.04.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosales-Serna R, Kohashi-Shibata J, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Trejo-López C, Ortiz-Cereceres J, Kelly JD (2004) Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crop Res 85:203–211. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00161-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck D (1991) Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 45:379–396. doi:10.1007/BF02887079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thung M, Rao IM (1999) Integrated management of abiotic stresses. Common bean improvement in the twenty-first century. Springer, Netherlands, pp 331–370

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Tropical Legumes I project that is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and managed by the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). We also thank Miguel Grajales and bean breeding and physiology teams at CIAT, Colombia for their research support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jose Polania or Idupulapati M. Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polania, J., Rao, I.M., Cajiao, C. et al. Physiological traits associated with drought resistance in Andean and Mesoamerican genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 210, 17–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1691-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1691-5

Keywords

Navigation