Abstract
Plants of two bread wheat cultivars,Triticum aestivum L. ‘Katya Al’ and ‘Mexipak 65’, were grown in pots during the crop season in the field in NW Syria, a region with a Mediterranean climate. The experiment involved two treatments. Control plants were well-watered throughout the experiment (watering to 0.22 g water g−1 dry soil). In the second treatment, water was withheld from the plants until soil water content had decreased to 0.10 g water g−1 dry soil, the level that was maintained thereafter. Water use was measured by weighing the pots, and growth by destructive sampling. Growth of Katya and Mexipak was similar. Mexipak had a lower (though not significant atp<0.05) plant water use efficiency (WUEp) in both treatments due to higher rates of water loss. On a leaf area basis differences in water use were especially high since Mexipak had a smaller total leaf area. In spite of a smaller investment in photosynthesizing area, Mexipak achieved similar growth as Katya. Carbon isotope discrimination and organic nitrogen concentration (both higher for Mexipak) suggest that Mexipak accomplished higher mean net photosynthetic rates with a higher mean leaf diffusive conductance, higher intercellular carbon dioxide partial pressure, and possibly a greater investment in the photosynthetic apparatus compared to Katya. Differences in carbon isotope discrimination suggest a larger difference in average photosynthetic WUE (net photosynthesis/transpiration) than in plant WUE. This could indicate that loss of carbon in respiration was greater in Katya. Gas exchange measurements on the youngest fully expanded leaves showed only minor differences between the cultivars. It is hypothesized that Mexipak, with a smaller total leaf area, is able to maintain high leaf conductance and photosynthesis for a longer period of time during the day or during the life span of leaves.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarke J M 1987 Use of physiological and morphological traits in breeding programmes to improve drought resistance of cereals.In Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals. Eds. J P Srivastava, E Porceddu, E Acevedo and S Varma. pp 171–189. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Ehleringer J R and Osmond C B 1989 Stable isotopes.In Plant Pysiological Ecology, Field Methods and Instrumentation. Eds R W Pearcy, J R Ehleringer, H A Mooney and P W Rundel. pp 281–300. Chapman and Hall, London.
Farquhar G D, Ehleringer J R and Hubick K T 1989 Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40, 503–537.
Farquhar G D, Hubick K T, Condon- A G and Richards R A 1988 Carbon isotope fractionation and plant water use efficiency.In Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. Eds. P W Rundel, J R Ehleringer and K A Nagy. pp 21–40. Springer, New York.
Pala M 1991 The performance of durum and bread wheat genotypes under different moisture regimes.In Farm Resource Management Program, Annual Report 1990. pp 68–74. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.
Siddique K H M, Belford R K and Tennant D 1990 Root:shoot ratios of old and modern, tall and semi-dwarf wheats in a mediterranean environment. Plant and Soil 121, 89–98.
Van Keulen H, Goudriaan J and Seligman N G 1989 Modelling the effects of nitrogen on canopy development and crop growth.In Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function. Eds. G Russell, B Marshall and P G Jarvis. pp 83–104. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wright G C, Hubick K T and Farquhar G D 1988 Discrimination in carbon isotopes of leaves correlates with water-use efficiency of field-grown peanut cultivars. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15, 815–825.
Yoneyama T and Ohtani T 1983 Variations of natural13C abundances in leguminous plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 24, 971–977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Veneklaas, E.J., Peacock, J.M. Growth, biomass allocation and water use efficiency of two wheat cultivars in a mediterranean environment; a pot experiment under field conditions. Plant Soil 162, 241–247 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01347711
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01347711