Abstract
This study employs the Heckman selection model to identify factors affecting the adoption of zero tillage (ZT) and measure its yield, income, and consumption impacts among Syrian wheat producers. A stochastic production frontier model is also estimated to compare the productive efficiency of adopters and non-adopters. Model results show that participation in field days and hosting on-farm demonstration trials are among the most important variables that enhance adoption. ZT increases yield, consumption, and income and reduces income risk-lifting 57 % of the adopters out of poverty. A shift from conventional tillage (CT) to ZT would helps farmers to be more technically efficient in production and achieve current output levels with 22 % less inputs. Along with environmental benefits documented in existing literature, this study shows that ZT is one of the few technologies whose benefits can be justified on environmental, economic, and food security grounds.The policy implications of these results are that education and extension that encourage farmers to participate in field days and host demonstration trials on their own farms are essential in promoting ZT technology adoption. In-depth analysis of the trade-offs between crop residue retention and the resulting loss in livestock feed in mixed crop–livestock production systems is warranted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdulai A, Eberlin R (2001) Technical efficiency during economic reform in Nicaragua: evidence from farm household survey data. Econ Syst 25:113–125
Assunção JJ, Braido LHB (2007) Testing household-specific explanations for the inverse productivity relationship. Am J Agric Econ 89(4):980–990
Barrett CB, Bellemare MF, Hou JY (2010) Reconsidering conventional explanations of the inverse productivity–size relationship. World Dev 38(1):88–97
Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Econ 20:325–332
Belloum A (2014) Conservation agriculture in the Arab World between concept and application. In: Stewart BI, Asfary AF, Belloum A, Steiner K, Friedrich T (eds). Conservation agriculture for sustainable land management to improve the livelihood of people in dry areas. http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/doc/CA%20Workshop%20procedding%2008–08-08.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2014
Bogetoft P, Otto L (2011) Benchmarking with DEA, SFA and R. Springer, New York
Bremer J, Livingston S, Parker R, Stichler C (2001) Conservation tillage applications. Texas Coop. Ext., Texas A & M University, College Station
Carter MR (1984) Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: an empirical analysis of peasant agricultural production. Oxf Econ Pap 36:131–145
Coelli TJ (1992) A computer program for frontier production function estimation: frontier, version 2.0. Econ Lett 39:29–32
Coelli T, Henningsen A (2011) Frontier: stochastic frontier analysis. R package version 0.997–14. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=frontier. Accessed 15 Jan 2013
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Deen W, Kataki PK (2003) Carbon sequestration in a long-term conventional versus conservation tillage experiment. Soil Tillage Res 74(2):143–150
De Janvry A, Fafchamps M, Sadoulet E (1991) Peasant household behavior with missing markets: some paradoxes explained. Econ J 101:1400–1417
Endale D, Schomberg H, Fisher D, Jenkins M, Sharpe R, Cabrera M (2008) No-till corn productivity in a Southeastern United States ultisol amended with poultry litter. Agron J 100:1401–1408
Erenstein O, Laxmi V (2008) Zero tillage impacts in India’s rice-wheat systems: a review. Soil Tillage Res 100(1–2):1–14
Feder G (1985) The relation between farm size and farm productivity: the role of family labor, supervision and credit constraints. J Dev Econ 18(2–3):297–313
Feder G, Richard EJ, David Z (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Chang 33:255–298
Friedrich T, Derpsch R, Kassam A (2012) Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. J Field Actions 6. Field Actions Science Reports Special. http://factsreports.revues.org/1941. Accessed 13 Dec 2013
Fulton M (2010) Foreword. In: Lindwall C, Sonntag B (eds) Landscapes transformed: the history of conservation tillage and direct seeding. knowledge impact in society. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, pp 9–14. http://www.kis.sk.ca/ZeroTill/LandscapesTransformed_HistoryofCT_Book.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2013
Giller KE, Witter E, Corbeels M, Tittonell P (2009) Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field Crops Res 114(1):23–34
Greene W (1997) Econometric analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Greiner R, Patterson L, Miller O (2009) Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers. Agric Syst 99:86–104
Harper J (1996) Economics of conservation tillage. Conservation Tillage Series. No. 6. Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences
Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a error specification bias. Econometrica 47(1):153–161
Horowitz J, Ebel R, Ueda K (2010) No-till farming is a growing practice. Economic Information Bulletin, No.70. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib70.aspx. Accessed 13 Dec 2013
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) (2012) Conservation agriculture: opportunities for intensified farming and environmental conservation in dry areas. ICARDA Research to Action 2. http://www.icarda.org/sites/default/files/conv-agree.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2014
Jha D, Hojjati B, Vosti S (1990) The use of improved agricultural technology in Eastern Province. In: Celis R, Milimo JT, Wanmali S (eds) Adopting improved farm technology: a study of smallholder farmers in eastern province, Zambia. University of Zambia, Government of the Republic of Zambia, and IFRPI, Washington, DC
Knowler D, Bradshaw B (2007) Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: a review and synthesis of recent research. Food Pol 32:25–48
Lamb RL (2003) Inverse productivity: land quality, labor markets, and measurement error. J Dev Econ 71(1):71–95
Lankoski J, Ollikainen M, Uusitalo P (2004) No-till technology: benefits to farmers and the environment? Discussion paper 1, Helsinki, Finland, University of Helsinki, March 2004
Lennox C, Francis J, Wang Z (2012) Selection models in accounting research. Account Rev 87(2):589–616
Llewellyn RS, D’Emden FH, Kuehne G (2012) Extensive use of no-tillage in grain growing regions of Australia. Field Crops Res 132:204–212
Liu Z, Juzhong Z (2000) Determinants of technical efficiency in post-collective Chinese agriculture: evidence from farm-level data. J Comp Econ 28:545–564
Nicholson W (2005) Microeconomic theory: basic principles and extensions. Thomson, Mason
Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation technologies by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric 46(11):1407–1424
Pannell DJ, Llewellyn RS, Corbeels M (2013) The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee. 2013.10.014
Piggin C, Haddad A, Khalil Y (2011) Development and promotion of zero tillage in Iraq and Syria. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, Brisbane. 26–29 September 2011, Australia, pp 304–305
Ribera L, Hons F, Richardson J (2004) An economic comparison between conventional and no-tillage farming systems in Burleson County, Texas. Agron J 96:415–424
Sidhu RS, Kamal V, Dhaliwal HS (2010) Conservation agriculture in Punjab: economic implications of technologies and practices. Indian J Agric Econ 53(3):1413–1427
Smale M, Kaunda ZHW, Makina HL, Mkandawire MMMK, Msowoya MNS, Mwale DJEK, Heisey PW (1991) Chimanga Cha Makolo, hybrids and composites: an analysis of farmers’ adoption of maize technologies in Malawi, 1989–91. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper 91/04, Mexico, D.F
Smiley R, Wilkins D (1993) Annual spring barley growth, yield and root rot in high- and low-residue tillage systems. J Prod Agric 6:270–275
Toomet O, Henningsen A (2008) Sample selection models in R: package sample selection. J Stat Softw 27(7):1–23. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v27/i07/. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
Wagger M, Denton H (1989) Tillage effects on grain yields in a wheat double-crop soybean, and corn rotation. Agron J 81:493–498
Williams J, Pendel D, Llewelyn R, Peterson D, Nelson R (2009) Returns to tillage systems under changing input and output market conditions. J ASFMRA 78–93 . http://www.asfmra.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/301_Williams.pdf
Wilson P, Hadley D, Ashby C (2001) The influence of management characteristics on the technical efficiency of wheat farmers in Eastern England. Agricu Econ 24:329–338
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to our Syrian partners in the ACIAR–AusAID Iraq project, who helped to implement the participatory extension program to promote ZT in Syria and, importantly in the context of this chapter, arranged for the survey questionnaire to be distributed, filled in, and collected under very difficult circumstances during 2011/12. These collaborators were scientists, extension officers, researchers, and support staff from many Syrian agricultural institutions, including the Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform (MAAR), Directorates of Extension, General Commission for Scientific and Agricultural Research (GCSAR), AGF, Aleppo Agricultural Machinery Training Center, the Syrian Libya Company (SYLICO), and private agricultural consultants and ZT seeder manufacturers . We are also grateful to ACIAR and AusAID for support and funding the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yigezu, Y. et al. (2015). Explaining Adoption and Measuring Impacts of Conservation Agriculture on Productive Efficiency, Income, Poverty, and Food Security in Syria. In: Farooq, M., Siddique, K. (eds) Conservation Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11620-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11620-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11619-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11620-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)