Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of markers linked to late leaf spot and rust resistance, and selection of superior genotypes among diverse recombinant inbred lines and backcross lines in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from four populations involving cultivated varieties, and backcross lines from three populations involving cultivated varieties and synthetic tetraploids (developed from wild diploids) were employed for validating late leaf spot (LLS) and rust resistance-linked markers and identifying superior genotypes in peanut. GM2009, GM2301, GM2079, GM1536, GM1954 and IPAHM103 markers showed significant association with rust resistance. They were successfully validated in a new RIL (TG 19 × GPBD 4) and two backcross (DH 86 × ISATGR 278-18 and DH 86 × ISATGR 5) populations. GM1954, GM1009 and GM1573 markers showed significant association with LLS resistance. TAG 19 × GPBD 4 and ICGS 76 × ISATGR 278-18 populations showed strong co-segregation of LLS-linked markers with the phenotype. From these genetic resources, six superior genotypes were identified. RIL 78-1 was resistant to LLS and rust, and recorded 30 % more pod yield than GPBD 4 (control). It also had higher kernel yield and oil yield along with higher oleate and linoleate content over GPBD 4. These genetic and genomic resources could be useful in breeding for LLS and rust resistance in peanut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhat RS, Sujay V, Mukri G, Khedikar YP, Sarvamangala C, Yeri SB, Jadhav SS, Pujer SB, Narasimhulu R, Varshakumari, Azharudheen TPM, Varshney RK, Nadaf HL, Gowda MVC (2012) Utility of peanut mapping populations developed at UAS Dharwad, India VI International Conference on Legume Genetics and Genomics (ICLGG), Hyderabad Marriott Hotel & Convention Centre Hyderabad, India

  • Bromfield K, Bailey W (1972) Inheritance of resistance to Puccinia arachidis in peanut. Phytopathology 62:748

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuc LM, Mace ES, Crouch JH, Quang VD, Long TD, Varshney RK (2008) Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite markers and their application for diversity assessment in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). BMC Plant Biol 8:55

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50

  • Gowda MVC, Motagi BN, Naidu GK, Diddimani SB, Sheshagiri R (2002) GPBD 4: a spanish bunch groundnut genotype resistant to rust and late leaf spot. Int Arachis Newslet 22:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • IBPGR/ICRISAT (1992) Descriptors for groundnut, International Board of Plant Genetic Resources and International Crops Research Institute For the Semi-Arid Tropics, Rome, Italy and Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India

  • Khedikar Y, Gowda MVC, Sarvamangala C, Patgar K, Upadhyaya H, Varshney R (2010) A QTL study on late leaf spot and rust revealed one major QTL for molecular breeding for rust resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 121:971–984

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari V, Gowda MVC, Tasiwal V, Pandey MK, Bhat RS, Mallikarjuna N, Upadhyaya HD, Varshney RK (2014) Diversification of primary gene pool through introgression of resistance for foliar diseases from synthetic amphidiploids to cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop J 2:110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallikarjuna N, Reddy K, Jadhav DR, Husain F, Das K (2012) Screening new Arachis amphidiploids, and autotetraploids for sources of resistance to late leaf spot by detached leaf technique. Eur J Plant Pathol 132:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald D, Subrahmanyam P, Gibbons RW, Smith DH (1985) Early and late leaf spots of groundnut. Inf Bull 21:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramasivam K, Jayasekhar M, Rajasekharan R, Veerabadhiran P (1990) Inheritance of rust resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Madras Agric J 77:50–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao NG (2007) Statistics for Agricultural Sciences. Oxford and IBH Publishing company, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilpa K, Sunkad G, Kurella S, Marri S, Padmashree K, Jadhav DR, Sahrawat KL, Mallikarjuna N (2013) Biochemical composition and disease resistance in newly synthesized amphidiploid and autotetraploid peanuts. Food Nutr Sci 4:169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Mehan V, Nigam S (1997) Sources of resistance to groundnut fungal and bacterial diseases: an update and appraisal. Report No. 9290663677, ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh

  • Subbarao PV, Subramanyam P, Reddy PM (1990) A modified nine points diseases scale for assessment of rust and late leaf spot of groundnut.In: Second International Congress of French Phytopathological SocietyFrench Phyto-Pathological Society, MontpellierFrance25

  • Subrahmanyam P, McDonald D, Waliar F, Reddy LJ, Nigam SN, Gibbons RW, Rao VR, Singh AK, Pande S, Reddy PM, Rao PVS (1995) Screening Methods and Sources of Resistance to Rust and Late Leaf Spot of Groundnut. ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujay V, Gowda MVC, Pandey MK, Bhat RS, Khedikar YP, Nadaf HL, Gautami B, Sarvamangala C, Lingaraju S, Radhakrishan T, Knapp SJ, Varshney RK (2012) QTL analysis and construction of consensus genetic map for foliar disease resistance based on two RIL populations in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Mol Breed 30:773–788

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari S, Ghewande M, Misra D (1984) Inheritance of resistance to rust and late leaf spot in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Cytol Genet 19:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Varshakumari, Introgression of foliar disease resistance using synthetic amphidiploids and identification of associated QTLs in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences (2013)

  • Varshney RK, Pandey MK, Pasupuleti J, Nigam SN, Sudini H, Gowda MVC, Sriswathi M, Radhakrishan T, Manohar SS, Patne N (2014) Marker-assisted introgression of a QTL region to improve rust resistance in three elite and popular varieties of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 127:1771–1781

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Basten C, Zeng Z (2007) Windows QTL cartographer 2.5. North Carolina State University

  • Wynne J, Beute M, Nigam S (1991) Breeding for disease resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Annu Rev Phytopathol 29:279–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeri SB, Shirasawa K, Pandey MK, Gowda MVC, Sujay V, Shriswathi M, Nadaf HL, Motagi BN, Lingaraju S, Bhat ARS, Varshney RK, Krishnaraj PU, Bhat RS (2014) Development of NILs from heterogeneous inbred families for validating the rust resistance QTLs in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Breed 133:80–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (2003) Biostatistical Analysis. Pearson Education Inc., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge Dr. Nalini Mallikarjuna, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India for sparing the synthetic tetraploids. The financial support received from ICAR (New Delhi), DBT (New Delhi) and RKVY in carrying out this study is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Bhat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sukruth, M., Paratwagh, S.A., Sujay, V. et al. Validation of markers linked to late leaf spot and rust resistance, and selection of superior genotypes among diverse recombinant inbred lines and backcross lines in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 204, 343–351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1339-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1339-2

Keywords

Navigation